I use exams as about 60 percent of the students' grade in the class. I don't like to go over 60 percent, because I think there are lots of things that can't be assessed in a timed exam situation. The format of my exams is generally 1/2 short answer, and 1/2 multiple choice. The short answer questions typically target a certain issue very specifically, to avoid essay type situations that are hard to grade and hard for students to do under a time pressure situation. I do like to have students turn in reports/essays, but not in an exam situation. Exams are always in-class, taking no more than 48 min; final exam is in class, comprehensive, and takes 1 hr 50 min. It's typically 1 1/2 times as long as a regular midterm. Almost all students finish in the allotted time. I do not believe in pushing students to work very quickly by giving them lots of questions. I prefer to write fewer questions and have them think more deeply about them. I also prefer students to feel they were given a fair amount of time, so they can hold themselves more accountable (rather than me) regarding their exam experience. I use exams because I feel I have to, that the university would think I was crazy if I didn't. I'd prefer lots of inclass experiences that added up to more than 60 percent of their grade, with a few quizzes in between, and maybe some sort of culminating experience where they needed to show what they knew. I don't think exams always show what a student really knows, but that may be in how we write the exams. A professor can really determine how students are going to do, merely by how he/she writes the exam, and I don't like that. I do minimal things to help deter cheating, but I don't do a lot. I think some of the mechanisms people use (taking digital photos of students, video taping them during exams, etc.) are more distracting to the good students, and that's where I draw the line.

See all answers to this question

See all of Deb's answers